175R. Harrod to F. A. Lindemann, 29 March 1930 [a]
Harrod comments on Lord Birkenhead's letter in The Times.  He writes that it was a mistake to give the matter that kind of publicity at that stage: the ground won in the University is now all lost, and the Chancellor will be unmoved. 
2. Harrod was supporting in the Hebdomadal Council Lindemann's claim that the Radcliffe observatory should be built in Oxford rather than in South Africa. The story is recalled in Harrod, The Prof. (1959), pp. 136-40. For context see also F. W. F. Smith (second Earl of Birkenhead), The Prof in Two Worlds. The Official Life of Professor F. A. Lindemann, Viscount Cherwell, London: Collins, 1961, pp.137-41.
Lindemann later commented on Birkenhead's letter (31 March 1930, in HPBL Add. 71185/116-17), and in a further letter to Harrod (20 April 1930, in HPBL Add. 71185/118-19) reported that Turner wrote a letter to The Times ("Astronomy at Oxford. Future of Radcliffe Observatory", 17 April 1930, p. 10), and announced that he wrote a rejoinder ("Astronomy at Oxford", The Times, 26 April 1930, p. 6).
- a. From 34 Campden Hill Gardens, W. 8., one page ALS, in CHER K142/8.
top of page
Return to index of this section
Go to previous page
Go to next page