714. William Beveridge to Harrod , 1 November 1937 [a]
[Replies to 708 ]
The Master's Lodging, University College, Oxford #
1 November 1937
My dear Harrod,
Many thanks for your note, which I should have acknowledged before but I have been particularly busy.
I am very glad that you like the general argument of my address on the Social Sciences.  Of course I agree that what Keynes writes arises out of his interpretation of the world as he sees it, and obviously also, to all his other gifts he adds a very penetrating power of understanding the world as he sees it; but I feel that scientific observation implies something rather more systematic than this, particularly on the side of verification [b] .
I did my best moreover, in my address, to make it clear that I was criticising, not Keynes in particular, but his professional critics as much as him, for their neglect of verification.
But I need not pursue these minor points. The main point, I think, is that we [c] have to try to get the resources to make something like a new start in economics, based on the combination of statistics, field work and reasoning; particularly we have to develop the technique of observation appropriate to sciences which cannot dissect or experiment.
I am expecting to meet you at the Institute on Wednesday. If you are free I hope you will come back to tea after the meeting.
W H Beveridge
H.R.F. Harrod, Esq., Christ Church
- a. TLS with autograph corrections, one page, in HPBL Add. 71182/3. CC in Beveridge V/19-32. © British Library of Political and Economic Science, Archives Division , London.
b. Autograph correction; Cc: «observation».
c. The word "really" was crossed out at this point, but not from the Cc.
top of page
Return to index of this section
Go to previous page
Go to next page