600R. O. Strachey to Harrod, 13 November 1936 [a]

Strachey thanks Harrod for his paper in Mind, and submits some comments, hoping that Harrod will put him right at the next Cranium. In particular, he disagrees on the definitions of "act" and "actions", and more in general on Harrod's terminology. [1]

  1. 1. Harrod, "Utilitarianism Revised" ( 1936:5 ), p. 141. Harrod sent a note in reply, which was not found. Strachey could not make it to the Cranium Club meeting, but hoped to be able to talk the paper over with Harrod (26 November 1936, in HPBL Add. 71191/219-20).
    1. a. From 53 Marsham Street, Westminster, ALS, one page, with four pages AN, in HPBL Add. 71191/212-16.


Welcome page

top of page

Return to index of this section

Go to previous page

Go to next page