514. Harrod to J. E. Meade , 16 January 1936 [a]

[Replies to 513 , answered by 515 ]

Christ Church, Oxford #

16 January 1936

My dear James

I entirely agree with the point which you make by reference to your cases.

The trouble is that after a slump though there may be some surplus capital capacity there will not be as much as there is surplus labour. For whereas in the slump years the population continues to grow and possibly also methods improve in accordance with the secular trend, capital equipment does not do so [b] . Therefore in the nature of the case there will be more surplus labour than surplus capital when the revival begins. I suspect that it is difficult to get a good revival going until in most industries surplus capital is fairly well reduced by obsolescence etc. so that a substantial advance will necessitate new equipment.

I probably ought to go rather more carefully into the conditions of surplus capital at the revival.

Yours

Roy.

I sent the sections of Ch 3 which I have so far written from London. [1]

  1. 1. Harrod, The Trade Cycle ( 1936:8 ). From Meade's comment (letter 515 , [jump to page] ) it would seem that Harrod sent sections I and II on "Interest" and "Money" (pp. 110-45), while he had not written out the section on "The Foreign Balance."
    1. a. ALS, two pages on one leaf, in MP 2/4(28); photocopy in HP (NC).

      b. Ms: «not to do so».


Welcome page

top of page

Return to index of this section

Go to previous page

Go to next page