398. Harrod to G. Haberler , 10 November 1934 [a]

[Follows on from 397 , replies to 395 and 396 , continues at 399 ]

Christ Church, Oxford #

10 November 1934

My dear Haberler

There has been some criss-crossing in our letters. Your letter which I received yesterday dated Nov. 6 referred to your pausing to reconsider "my first point" and I assumed that was the main point we had at issue and expressed pleasure accordingly in mine dated [b] Nov. 9. But by your letter of this morning (dated Nov. 7) I see that this is not so.

I had some talk about this point with Marschak [1] --tho' for arbitration you would have to submit your case--and he agreed with me that SI implies an unnatural definition of S or I.


Roy Harrod

  1. 1. This was repeatedly suggested by Haberler: see letter 384 , [jump to page] , letter 393 , [jump to page] , and letter 395 , [jump to page] .
    1. a. ALS, two pages on one leaf, in GH Box 66.

      b. Ms: «date».

Welcome page

top of page

Return to index of this section

Go to previous page

Go to next page