17. H. F. Scott-Stokes to Harrod, 3 May 1922

Kalamazoo Works,

Northfield,

Birmingham.

3 May 1922

My dear Roy,

Many thanks for Marx and your comments - I agree; one must be more of a Jesuit and less of one who merely thinks aloud, and I recognize the need of some serious economics. I'd be very glad of a slip of paper some day with the names of the standard works - I feel a frightful dabbler. And by the grace of God I have unlimited leisure in view - K'zoo are cutting down staff, and much as I disliked my work I felt that the position of a dependent relative had really become intolerable, so I am out in the road from Saturday fortnight - and, egad, I mean to spend the first week sitting all through Eights, if you'll tell me when Eights are. After that I've made a plan to keep the wolf from the door during the summer months - it means letting the cottage, alas, but can't be helped - and then I hope to come back and have some arguments with the poor and ignorant of Birmingham during the winter. I've been doing it in the Works once a week all this year - nominally `Modern Political Thought' - and have encountered much kindness and encouragement, and I've written a perfectly beautiful book about Job [or God? difficult to read, CSS] and all those other old loves - 10 pages precisely, in type! I really think that's rather an achievement. You shall see it some day soon, when your toils are ended.

Back to Marx: I've read & I think thoroughly grasped the theory of rent since writing that paper (a full year ago now), and I have it clear in my mind now that no other than `customary justice' can possibly be applied to the distribution of wealth - is that wrong? But the worst thing about the paper is its assumption that laissez-faire has once and for all gone by the board. I believe that the working sum today is

Market price - fixed by competition

minus interest on capital - ditto

minus all other charges (except wages) - ditto

= wage-fund - & what I gain by bargaining some other man loses

- and that this must remain so until you have an international Govt. prepared to enforce a certain standard of living all round; until you do that one country can no more do it (unless completely isolated & self-supporting, which is unthinkable) than the individual manufacturer could pay his folk properly while others were free to sweat them.

I loathe competition with all my heart and soul; I am sure that it's immensely wasteful - I think of the figures men give of America `1 salesman to 1 workman', and even here 40% of the market-price is very small for selling costs; men are degraded day and night by the doctrine that no sane man ever does anything except for more money; and if they are salesmen they must worship the moneyed man (because he alone can give them orders - you can't imagine what orders mean to a business-man until you've seen it) - wait on him, fawn on him, flatter him, spread themselves in the mud before him - and this is called `salesmanship'. Well, well, I shall never resent rudeness in a shop-assistant again - I'll admire it.

HFSS

  1. 1. British Library, Harrod Collection, Folder Add. 71613, fol.1 (transcribed by Charity Scott Stokes)


Welcome page

top of page

Return to index of this section

Go to previous page

Go to next page